Looks like this is it.
Prepared
#18761 Exocet Classing into XP
The PAC feels the Exocet is an example of a kit car that is produced rather than being a production car. Replicas of
production cars are considered on a case by case basis. The PAC thanks the member for their inquiry.
Note: Please see related item #17892 elsewhere herein.
Modified
#17892 Exomotive Exocet in DM/EM
Per the MAC, the following rule change proposal package is submitted for member comment:
Modify 18.1.A.1 as follows:
- re-letter the second subsection group in 18.1.A.1 to be g, h, i, j, and k
- modify what will then be subsection i in 18.1.A.1 to read as follows:
i. They will be allowed all, but no more than, the modifications that production-based cars are permitted,
with the exception that minimum width for all kit cars shall be no less than 65" as measured at the narrower end
of the car at the tire outer sidewalls with a minimum 14 psi of tire pressure.SCCA Fastrack News April 2016 Page 10
- add new subsection l as follows:
l. They must compete with full standard bodywork and that body must remain recognizable as that of the
approved make and model. For these purposes, the chassis of exoskeleton type cars is considered part of the
bodywork.
- add new subsection m as follows:
m. Functional wings are not permitted even if they are part of the original kit manufacturer’s specification
and/or components. If present they must meet 18.1.F.6.
- modify 18.1.F.6 as follows:
6. If the a factory production or kit car was supplied with tunnels or wings, they may remain but they must
be blocked in a safe manner to prevent them from functioning to provide downforce. For example, foam or sheet
metal may be firmly attached in tunnels or on wings to ruin their shape or to stop airflow.
Note: if this change proposal is implemented, the specifications added to the listing for the Exomotive Exocet will be
removed, since these changes have the same effect.
