|
6ULs
Aug 11, 2015 7:18:40 GMT
Post by theancientone on Aug 11, 2015 7:18:40 GMT
Hi......did a search and found some mentions of 6ULs. Is anyone running 9 inch 6ULs on an Exocet? Thanks.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 11, 2015 11:37:49 GMT
Post by greg on Aug 11, 2015 11:37:49 GMT
Search posts by thejeffman.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 11, 2015 12:08:10 GMT
via mobile
Post by theancientone on Aug 11, 2015 12:08:10 GMT
I'm painfully slow, but I can't find a member with the name 'thejeffman' and so can't find any posts.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 11, 2015 13:02:35 GMT
Post by JIDiesel on Aug 11, 2015 13:02:35 GMT
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 11, 2015 13:54:26 GMT
Post by boileralum on Aug 11, 2015 13:54:26 GMT
The short answer is that you need much lower offset wheels on the Exocet than a miata, so to run the 6ULs, you would need to run some big spacers. There is a google doc that Warren made , I think I saw it linked in the thread on GRM. I have it bookmarked on my home computer, but don't have it here at work.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 11, 2015 19:53:26 GMT
via mobile
Post by theancientone on Aug 11, 2015 19:53:26 GMT
Please forgive my ignorance....why, in principle, does the Exocet need a lower offset than the Miata/MX5.
|
|
|
Post by mawdo81 on Aug 11, 2015 21:02:04 GMT
Moves the back of the wheel away from the frame and wheel arch mounts. Something the miata avoids through the chassis itself.
Sent from my GT-I8190N using proboards
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 11, 2015 21:41:36 GMT
via mobile
Post by theancientone on Aug 11, 2015 21:41:36 GMT
Thanks. So spacers are needed for clearance purposes rather than to optimise suspension geometry? Does this mean that the (reputedly excellent) suspension geometry of the Miata/MX5 is compromised by the spacers, and does it suggest (improbable as it might be to achieve) that an alternative way of supporting the wings/fenders would negate the need for spacers?
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 11, 2015 22:08:40 GMT
Post by tacan on Aug 11, 2015 22:08:40 GMT
The spacers are for clearance. We are stuck running a 0 offset 15x8 or effectively a -12 15x9 to clear the frame in back, OR spacers in the 36mm range. I have not seen anyone post numbers/pictures/specs showing what you can get away with as far as minimum clearance, i.e. a 205 on a 15x8 +36 needs 'X' spacer to clear, a 225 on a 15x9 needs 'Y'. Granted, this isn't easy as every component involved is going to affect clearance, every tire is going to be different and what works on the street might not on the track. I was a little ticked that the clearance issue wasn't addressed in the U.S. redesign, and my nice ARP studs might have to come out for some giant blocks of aluminum. We are stuck with imperfect scrub radius, which might not make that much difference for most users(I personally liked the feeling better with the 'wrong' offset wheels, 11-16mm less than optimal). Getting into the serious wheel sizes (15x9) I bet it will matter, as the (possibly) 48mm wheel spacer you'd need for a 15x9 is getting really big. I really want to know just how little spacer I can get away with for 15x9 225's at the 36mm 6UL offset. The reality is, a bolt on spacer is the better way to do it from a mass, rotating mass and wheel strength perspective. For now, I'm running 15x8 0's with 205s.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 13, 2015 3:35:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by theancientone on Aug 13, 2015 3:35:48 GMT
Is this thinking correct? To get the necessary clearance the standard mk1 Miata/MX5 7J et45 wheel reportedly needs 30mm spacers. So for the same clearance a 7J et36 wheel would need 30-(45-36) = 21mm spacers. And for the same clearance a 9J et36 wheel would need 21+25 = 46mm spacers.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 13, 2015 5:50:06 GMT
Post by BTD on Aug 13, 2015 5:50:06 GMT
^ Math looks right to me. To get the same clearance:
15x7 = ~+15 offset 15x8 = ~+0 offset 15x9 = ~-15 offset
So on and so forth.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 13, 2015 6:46:00 GMT
Post by miket on Aug 13, 2015 6:46:00 GMT
Is this thinking correct? To get the necessary clearance the standard mk1 Miata/MX5 7J et45 wheel reportedly needs 30mm spacers. So for the same clearance a 7J et36 wheel would need 30-(45-36) = 21mm spacers. And for the same clearance a 9J et36 wheel would need 21+25 = 46mm spacers. Just in case size matters - the UK Exo Build Guide says 32mm spacers rather than 30mm... "The wing stays are designed to use 195/45-16 wheels/tyres either with a 32mm spacer for 45 ET wheels or no spacer if you buy 15ET wheels". Better safe then rubbing eh!
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 13, 2015 7:27:29 GMT
via mobile
Post by theancientone on Aug 13, 2015 7:27:29 GMT
Thanks. So that's how 'tacan' gets to 48mm spacers for 9" et36 wheels.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 13, 2015 9:24:10 GMT
via mobile
Post by theancientone on Aug 13, 2015 9:24:10 GMT
Sorry to go on about this but Miket's quote from the Build Guide raises the query of whether it's the design of the wing/fender stays which determines the need for and size of spacers..... or the proximity of the bodywork/chassis. I ask this because I keep coming back to the fact that we sometimes run 9" 6ULs on our Mk2.5 MX5 without spacers, without modifications to the bodywork, and without any rubbing. And to my inexpert eye there doesn't look to be anything on the Exocet which is nearer to the wheels than on the MX5. I guess the way to find out is to trial fit the 6ULs on the Exocet.
|
|
|
6ULs
Aug 13, 2015 9:35:21 GMT
Post by mawdo81 on Aug 13, 2015 9:35:21 GMT
Look through the build diaries, there are some US auto-crossers who ran their cars pre body work (inc guards/fenders) that had issues with tires rubbing the chassis.
|
|